On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Simon Phipps <si...@webmink.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> I know that many people also have concerns with > >> potential community issues. But that is all a discussion for a later > >> time. Not here and now. > > > > With respect, that was the same phrase used to defer discussion during > the > > proposal process. Leaving community concerns until all the decisions are > > made and the only remedy is "those other folk will just have to do like > we > > do" doesn't seem wise. > > Simon, in a prior email, you referred to a "negotiation". Forgive me, > but that indicates a fundamental problem with a frame of reference. > > There exists people here who will volunteer to set up a subversion > repository. There exists people here who will commit to maintaining > such on ASF infrastructure. > > Simon, you've indicated that there are people who might be willing to > host git repositories on other infrastructure. Of course, they are > welcome to do so. > > If there are people who are willing to work with the ASF > infrastructure team directly, they will be provided with the > opportunity to do so. Just be aware that others have tried in the > past and to date the results can most charitably be described as > "inconclusive" at this time. That doesn't mean that others aren't > welcome to try. If that is what is desired, the first step is to join > infrastructure-...@apache.org. > > Meanwhile, those that are willing to set up a subversion repository > are welcome to do so. And those that are willing to begin importing > code into that repository can begin once that is done. > I'm sorry, I don't understand your point. S.
