Hi *, On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Mathias Bauer <mathias_ba...@gmx.net> wrote: > On 15.11.2011 04:36, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >> >> Just wondering, >> >> Perhaps the older OOo at SUN/Oracle also had some >> setup for hudson/jenkins that we could reuse? > > No, unfortunately OOo never embraced continuous integration and all the > other wonderful things you can build around it.
There have been both tinderbox as well as buildbot available and in use in the OOo project. Tinderbox did keep track of commits, did flag build-results as "dirty" when there were commits after the last build started, and thus allowed rebuilding when a cws was touched, and (some) buildbots were autotriggered by watching the commit-mailinglist, so they as well did built whenever the code was changed. That the build-results have often been ignored by the corresponding developers is a different story. But stating that there was no such thing is, well, typical. ciao Christian
