Simple point: Something is category B because someone with the authority to do 
so put a category B license on it.  It doesn't matter what it is or how 
wrong-headed they were to do that.

More complicated: It is important to understand the principle behind how 
category B material is handled the way it is in binaries.  It is about not 
having users commit errors with regard to the licensing of some material and 
making it difficult to innocently violate the applicable license.  See < 
http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b> and note that it never 
suggests that source code (whatever that means in a given case) is ever in the 
SVN nor in the source of a release - the inclusion is only in binary form 
within the product, with suitable labeling, etc.  (There is an exception for 
certain kinds of *small* source, and "source" consumed at runtime.  I'd be very 
careful before assuming being discussed here qualifies for that exception is 
being discussed here.  I'm with Pedro on the prudence side.)

That FAQ is discussed with some regularity, and if it is not clear enough, 
questions to legal are appropriate.

-----Original Message-----
From: Pedro Giffuni [mailto:p...@apache.org] 
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2011 11:47
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: GPL'd dictionaries (was Re: ftp.services.openoffice.org?)

Hi Mathias;

--- On Thu, 11/24/11, Mathias Bauer <mathias_ba...@gmx.net> wrote:

> > 
> > You mean like just tar them all and put them with the
> binary
> > release?
> 
> Yes. Even packaging as extension and deploying these
> packages as part of a binary release does not look
> fundamentally different than bundling a library.
> 

I think this is a perfectly viable solution.

The only issue is what type of maintenance are
we planning to do on this. I had suggested
Apache Extras as a point of encounter for
contributors as we can't maintain this directly,
but perhaps this is something that doesn't get
updated very much or perhaps the real maintainers
can handle this on their own (as extensions).

Pedro.


> Regards,
> Mathias
> 
> >> 
> 

Reply via email to