On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 07:44 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:50 PM, drew <d...@baseanswers.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 03:47 +0200, Raphael Bircher wrote: > >> Am 12.04.12 03:40, schrieb Rob Weir: > >> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> > >> > wrote: > >> >> Rob, > >> >> > >> >> You are missing that Kay changed the subject and then had a back and > >> >> forth with Marcus to solve this trouble. > >> >> > >> > And the end result is that the page still says nothing about Apache, > >> > incubation or how to get involved with the project? > >> > > >> > I dunno about you, but I think we still have a problem. > >> The Feed is from the http://www.oooforum.dk/ so it's not maintained by > >> OOo. I think we have no danish people here atm who can make a update. I > >> propose to delete this feed on the dk site to avoid confusion. The > >> update from the site is a different storry. but this problem exist on > >> the moast NLC pages > >> > > Hi Raphael > > > > Well, I wouldn't necessarily go along with that idea. > > I'd say http://www.oooforum.dk/ is every bit as valid a community > > resource as the user services forums every were or are. > > > > I'd go with something in the middle. ooforum.dk is a resource. So we > should have a link to it. But it should not have its contents > imported wholesale into a top, central position of the webpage, as if > it were the voice of the AOO project. Its current prominence gives it > the appearance of official notifications from the project, which they > are not. That, combined with the total lack of actual project project > notifications, would confuse users. > > > They are acting at that forum in all material respects the same as the > > user services forums, the only difference being a somewhat more > > prominent LibO image (not an official one btw). > > > > I have no problem with the work they are doing on their own forums. > The issue is with the user-facing Danish page at openoffice.org. That > page does not seem to be maintained at all, which is the concern that > Raphael and I are pointing out. > > > So, does the sub-domain need upkeep - I guess, but I can see no reason > > to remove the feed from that forum. > > > > If no one steps forward to maintain that page (and the Norwegian one) > I'll find translators to translate the generic page into those > languages, so we have the basics at least covered for users.
And I will remove the pages from the website - if there is no community to back it up they should not be there. This is now a community project not a corporate project yes? //drew > > -Rob > > > my opinion, > > > > //drew > > >
