On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:02 AM, imacat <[email protected]> wrote: > FYI, I found that http://zh.openoffice.org/ is a redirection to > http://www.openoffice.org/zh now, which then separates into two > directory trees. The uniformed Chinese site does not exists. The > content is already separated. Keeping a uniformed Chinese entry page > does not make sense anymore. >
Look at it also from the directory layout perspective: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/ Each language is a subdirectory of /ooo-site/trunk/content We already have an example of similar differences. For example we have both a Portuguese website (/pt) and a Brazilian Portuguese website (/pt-br). So it sounds like you would do this; 1. create a new directory, content/zh-tw 2. svn copy the existing content from the old directory to the new directory 3. work on that content until it is ready to publish 4. Enter a JIRA issue requesting Infrastructure team to create a subdomain zh-tw.openoffice.org that points to content/zh-tw 5. Maybe also ask Infra to redirect requests from the old site to the new site -Rob > This also means that separation of Traditional and Simplified > Chinese is not a big work at all. > > On 2012/05/08 14:54, imacat said: >> On 2012/05/08 09:14, Zhe Liu said: >>> we can keep the current website address and automatically choose >>> Chinese traditional or simplified according to the user's locale, just >>> keep one copy of each page. IMHO，that will be save more time. >> >> Well, I'm not thinking about saving more time. I'm thinking about >> participation - which way may attract more local community that join our >> work. If we have separate sites what local community feels more >> comfortable, the two languages may each attract more people to join our >> work. Currently the zh-only site and especially forum attract only >> people from China, which is not right. >> >> Creating two sites requires more work, yes, but that is where we can >> call for volunteer for. ^_*' >> >> Besides, the current Chinese site is far too outdated. The >> "OpenOffice.org Chinese Project" become history for years. I was >> updating the 3.4 release information, and it come to my mind that, why >> not propose site separation altogether? >> >> If we agree, I shall start doing this in this week. Currently we >> only need home page, download page and a news page. Working on two >> sites for these pages is small work. > > -- > Best regards, > imacat ^_*' <[email protected]> > PGP Key http://www.imacat.idv.tw/me/pgpkey.asc > > <<Woman's Voice>> News: http://www.wov.idv.tw/ > Tavern IMACAT's http://www.imacat.idv.tw/ > Woman in FOSS in Taiwan http://wofoss.blogspot.com/ > Apache OpenOffice http://www.openoffice.org/ > EducOO/OOo4Kids Taiwan http://www.educoo.tw/ >
