2012/5/22 Andrea Pescetti <[email protected]>: > Shane Curcuru wrote: >> >> http://www.apache.org/free >> Any glaring errors? Anything I should add, or express more clearly? > > > I would add, when you state that the Apache License meets the Open Source > Initiative's (OSI) Open Source Definition, that it also meets the Free > Software Foundation's Free Software definition and thus it qualifies as > Free/Libre software. In the case of OpenOffice, which used to ship under a > GNU license, this would be helpful to users who want to be sure that the > license change gives them more freedom and not less freedom than before.
I definitely agree! bye, rob > Regards, > Andrea.
