Hi Ariel; --- Ven 8/6/12, Ariel Constenla-Haile <arie...@apache.org> ha scritto: ...
> > You are missing the context: > > - the Internship was > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org_Internship > - it was payed by Team OpenOffice.org on behalf of the > Community Council > with community resources > - the contributor signed the SCA > > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org_Internship#Terms_.26_Conditions > > This means the Intern owns the copyright on the code she/he > wrote. The issue in this case is that Daniel and Eike both > contributed code being Oracle employees. > Ah, OK ... I think the owner was the organization that paid, but one of the conditions for the internship was clearly to sign the JCA so only Oracle has control of the copyright without any reasonable doubt. Just for reference.. I once needed a header from a GSoC project that was written for Haiku (under MIT license). I needed that header under BSD 2 Clause license so I contacted the author. The author was paid by Google to do the project so instead of relicensing directly he had me contact the Haiku guys to get the header relicensed. After a long delay to get any answer, finally Haiku said it was OK to relicense the header under a BSD license but it took so long that I didn't really use the header at all. Hopefully we will get to use it for another GSoC this year :-P. Pedro.
