On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: > > On Jul 8, 2012, at 4:34 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote: >>> On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Ross Gardler <rgard...@opendirective.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Seems we missed a bit of process... >>>> >>>> From a mobile device - forgive errors and terseness >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>> From: "Henri Yandell" <flame...@gmail.com> >>>> Date: Jul 8, 2012 3:22 AM >>>> Subject: Old projects with incomplete copyright diligence >>>> To: "general-incubator" <gene...@incubator.apache.org> >>>> >>>> The following projects haven't signed off on the copyright checklist item: >>>> >>>> 2009-02-09 kato >>>> 2009-02-13 stonehenge >>>> 2009-05-13 socialsite >>>> 2010-05-19 amber >>>> 2010-09-05 nuvem >>>> 2010-11-12 kitty >>>> 2010-11-24 stanbol >>>> 2011-06-13 openofficeorg >>>> >>>> Said checklist item is: >>>> >>>> "Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF >>>> been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the >>>> package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project. " >>>> >> >> Also, does this question even make sense? >> >> Neither the SGA not the iCLA "transfers" any rights to the ASF. We >> don't ask for copyright. We just ask for a license. But it is >> non-exclusive. > > Trademarks and domain name registrations are transferred rights. Perhaps > trademarks@a.o can answer if this is completed for OpenOffice.org? Or, are > there unanswered questions and incomplete steps? > >> >> So if anyone thinks this refers to something that actually requires a >> "transfer" of copyright, please speak up, so we can track this down. > > It says "rights" and not "copyrights". It may be that this also includes the > point in time when all of the headers are converted to the AL headers and the > SVN passes the RAT test. Is this so? > > Regards, > Dave
That (source headers) is the next line item on the page. Hen
