Am 07/08/2012 01:04 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Ross Gardler<rgard...@opendirective.com> wrote:
Seems we missed a bit of process...
From a mobile device - forgive errors and terseness
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Henri Yandell"<flame...@gmail.com>
Date: Jul 8, 2012 3:22 AM
Subject: Old projects with incomplete copyright diligence
To: "general-incubator"<gene...@incubator.apache.org>
The following projects haven't signed off on the copyright checklist item:
2009-02-09 kato
2009-02-13 stonehenge
2009-05-13 socialsite
2010-05-19 amber
2010-09-05 nuvem
2010-11-12 kitty
2010-11-24 stanbol
2011-06-13 openofficeorg
Said checklist item is:
"Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF
been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the
package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project. "
How long do we host software without explicitly stating we have these
rights?
Personally I think 1 year is more than enough, even for OpenOffice.
Our practice has been to not check in code until after an SGA has been
received, e.g., the main OOo contribution from Oracle, the Symphony
contribution from IBM and the UOF 2.0 contribution from CS2C.
So I assume we just need to fill in a date here in the "copyright" section:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openofficeorg.html
But what date? The first SGA? The most recent SGA? This is an
ongoing effort, for any living project that gets ongoing contributions
of existing corporate code. I expect it will continue as a TLP as
well.
When we put in the first and the most recent date, maybe someone from
the Apache officials can tell which is *the* date. Otherwise we hit it
anyway.
My 2 ct.
Marcus
Note that this list comes from
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/projects
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
