Hi Olaf,

O.Felka schrieb:
Am 19.09.2012 14:34, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:

Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
your issue, if possible on a different operating system.


I agree with Oliver, the default status should be set to UNCONFIRMED
even if the reporter has canconfirm privileges. IMHO "confirmed" means
"confirmed by some else".


We have a lot of professional QA folks here: They know how to verify
their findings and issues. That's a lot of overhead if someone has to
re-test to confirm a well tested bug.
So we should trust the QA who has 'canconfirm' privileges.

If bug reports were really in a good state, I would not see a problem in starting in confirmed status. That has worked for a lot of years. But the problem is, that in recent weeks I have come across many bug reports, which started in confirmed status but are invalid or duplicate. Therefor my appeal, to be more careful.

Kind regards
Regina

Reply via email to