On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 06:22:29PM -0400, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote: > On 09/19/2012 08:34 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > >On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:24:11PM +0200, Oliver Brinzing wrote: > >>Hi Regina, > >> > >>>Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm > >>>your issue, if possible on a different operating system. > >>i am pretty sure that i did not set the "confirmed" status when submitting > >>a new issue, > >>default status is "confirmed" - and you have to select "Show Advanced > >>Fields" > >>to see the listbox ... this seems to be the root cause of the problem ... > > > >I agree with Oliver, the default status should be set to UNCONFIRMED > >even if the reporter has canconfirm privileges. IMHO "confirmed" means > >"confirmed by some else". > > > > > >Regards > if an unfiled bug is reported to me and I confirm it independently > (based on how it was reported to me), may I set it directly to > confirmed?
Yes, and this is what I usually do for bugs that I find. Submitting your issue and confirming it, is different from it being confirmed just because it's the default bugzilla setting. Of course, this can be considered an overhead, though it's simple a second step after pressing submit (that IMHO ensure carefulness). Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina
pgpQBNEIIuMYb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
