On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:52:44PM +0200, O.Felka wrote: > Am 19.09.2012 14:34, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile: > >> > >>>Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm > >>>your issue, if possible on a different operating system. > >> > > >I agree with Oliver, the default status should be set to UNCONFIRMED > >even if the reporter has canconfirm privileges. IMHO "confirmed" means > >"confirmed by some else". > > > > We have a lot of professional QA folks here: They know how to verify > their findings and issues. That's a lot of overhead if someone has > to re-test to confirm a well tested bug. > So we should trust the QA who has 'canconfirm' privileges.
I don't see much overhead; on the contrary, every careful reporter, after pressing "Submit", surely goes and check if he did fill everything ok. Leaving the default status to unconfirmed works just like a reminder to be careful. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina
pgpNlN42CsZzP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
