At 4:20 AM +0100 on 11/23/99, M. Uli Kusterer wrote: >>Anthony : We don't. That's why they're undocumented. >>But we leave them in the executable because: >> a) It's more work taking them out >> b) Allow a user track down a bug. > >Just remember, undocumented means not in the user's documentation, it >doesn't mean the commands are there but nobody on the dev team knows about >them. Everybody on the dev. team should know about them. And they will probably be documented in some development FAQ or somesuch. They just won't concern the user.
- OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax Alain Farmer
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk synta... DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk s... M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTa... DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTa... M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTa... DeRobertis
- OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax Alain Farmer
