>Multiple stacks in a single file... hmmm... sounds like a XBF issue. The is
>no reason why it would be hard to implement, except in XBF.
>
>If you do decide to implement it in XBF, I'd suggest allowing the blocks
>>from different stacks to be intermixed -- otherwise you're dealing with
>moving whole stacks around. Perhaps you could have additional subblocks:
>Make all the items in a stack sub-blocks of one stack object.
Anthony,
I had this in mind the whole time while writing XBF. I plan to have
additional block maps in each file for each block's sub blocks.
>It won't require much extra code. Interpreter already has plugin functions
>-- though they're presently written in NuTalk. It also has ones written in
>C. No problem having ones put in a shlb. [This refers to the present
>interpreter, not the new one which I've got to write].
Good to hear this. Though I'd suggest you keep an eye out that there are
several ways to call a function. At least the "the <functionName> of
<parameter>" as an equivalent to "<functionName>( <parameter> )" should be
supported, even for user functions. But I guess this'll turn out to be easy.
Cheers,
-- M. Uli Kusterer
------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.weblayout.com/witness
'The Witnesses of TeachText are everywhere...'
--- HELP SAVE HYPERCARD: ---
Details at: http://www.hyperactivesw.com/SaveHC.html
Sign: http://www.giguere.uqam.ca/petition/hcpetition.html
