At 3:36 PM +0100 on 11/25/99, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:

> Good to hear this. Though I'd suggest you keep an eye out that there are
>several ways to call a function. At least the "the <functionName> of
><parameter>" as an equivalent to "<functionName>( <parameter> )" should be
>supported, even for user functions. But I guess this'll turn out to be easy.

Yes, but remember that the...of... bypasses the message hierarchy, so you
can't call user-defined functions like that.

Reply via email to