At 3:36 PM +0100 on 11/25/99, M. Uli Kusterer wrote: > Good to hear this. Though I'd suggest you keep an eye out that there are >several ways to call a function. At least the "the <functionName> of ><parameter>" as an equivalent to "<functionName>( <parameter> )" should be >supported, even for user functions. But I guess this'll turn out to be easy. Yes, but remember that the...of... bypasses the message hierarchy, so you can't call user-defined functions like that.
- OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax Alain Farmer
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk synta... DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk s... M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTa... DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTa... M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTa... DeRobertis
- OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax Alain Farmer
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax M. Uli Kusterer
- OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax Alain Farmer
- Re: OODL: Prototyping OpenTalk syntax DeRobertis
