On 10/07/2017 04:39 PM, Linas Vepstas wrote> So here's a completely different but related idea: First, use a crisp
reasoner to deduce what happens whenever strength>0.9999. Next, do it again, but now for strength>0.8. (but still using the crisp reasoner: just take strength>0.8 to mean "true"). This should have a "broader" set of consequences. Do it again for strength>0.6 - this causes even more possibilities to be explored.

It seems like these three cases can be treated as "lower bounds" of what we might expect PLN to find. That these could be used to guide/limit what PLN explores.

Alternately, if this was fast enough, you could do this 100 times for 100 different truth cutoffs, and build up a distributional TV...

That's an interesting idea. You could

1. Sample the probability of each atom in the KB (axioms) according to their TV 2. Sample, according to this probabilities, whether the axiom is true or false
3. Run crisp-PLN over the dicretized theory, save the output
4. repeat 2. N times to obtain a probability of the output
5. repeat 1. M times to obtain a second order probability to regenerate the output TV

I suppose this type of crisp-PLN monte-carlos simulation should converge to PLN. The advantage could be real though, assuming PLN complexity grows with exp(alpha*L), and the complexity of crisp-PLN grows with exp(beta*L), with beta < alpha, L being the length of the proof, we'd reach a point where where M*N*exp(beta*L) < exp(alpha*L).

Certainly an idea to keep in mind.

Nil


I find this idea exciting!  It seems plausible, doable ...

--linas



    Nil


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to opencog+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to opencog@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/cdce29bd-ab2b-01cb-aa24-9fe16d7d2272%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to