Stef,

The correct Ontological method for solving this problem is to have an
organizing concept for the drug independent of its formulation.  In the
NDF-RT that would be the Preparations (e.g. Atenolol Preparation) which
can have different strengths and formulations (groups of inactive
ingredients as children of the more general concept). 

Warm regards,

Peter

Peter L. Elkin, MD
Professor of Medicine
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
(507) 284-1551
Fax: (507) 284-5370



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:openehr-clinical-bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of Stef
Verlinden
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 5:10 PM
To: openehr-clinical at openehr.org
Subject: Multiple terminologies

Dear all,

I need some help/explanation/advice on how to attach multiple  
terminologies to the same entry. If I understand the concept  
correctly it seems that there are two manners to do so. Let me  
explain first what I would like to do:

In the Dutch archetype for 'medication' I'm trying to make, I would  
like to attach several terminologies to the same medicine. In the  
Netherlands we use the G-standard which comprises of many sub  
terminologies. For instance there is a different code for generic and  
for 'named' drugs, which seem to be specific for the Netherlands.  
Furthermore each drug combination (drug, dose, delivery form and  
producer) has an unique code. To make it even more complex, this code  
was first specific for the Netherlands (RVG code) alone and then  
harmonized for the EU (EU code). Older drugs only have a RVG code.   
Then this medicine can also be related to the ATC code......  To make  
a long story short, I would like to be able to attach all these  
terminologies to the same medicine.

First I figured that I put al those items in one 'medicine' (sub)  
three. So Medicine name/dose/delivery form, GPK, HPK, EU, RVG, ATC.  
The latter would then have constraints for that specific (sub) 
terminology.
But now I just found out that it possible to create multiple ... (I  
don't know how to call this. I've found it for example in the  
archetype evaluation-injury, under the entry 'factor'. It has a  
symbol which resembles a switch). To me it seems that I can use this  
to attach several terminologies to the same item as well.  In the  
'interface' option' all these 'terminologies' are then displayed as  
tabs.

My question is: how can I best solve this issue. Can I use both  
methods or is one of them to prefer over the other and why?

Furthermore can somebody explain to me how I can create the switch  
type function. I known it exists since it's present in some  
archetypes but haven't found out how to create one via the Ocean  
archetype editor (latest version).

Thanks in advance,

Stef Verlinden
_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical at openehr.org
http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical

_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical at openehr.org
http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical



Reply via email to