Hi Rong, Sorry for the late response. For some reason I've overlooked this mail till today.
Unfortunately I haven't come much further. Here in the Netherlands several parties are interested and want to be involved (TNO and the KNMP (society of pharmacist who is responsible for the G-standard) but since we haven't a viable use/ bussiness case and/or sufficient money we're still waiting for better times. Hopefully we'll start a project after the summer involving a personal medication record and in that case we'll continue working on the medication AT. Cheers, Stef Op 9-mei-2008, om 9:27 heeft Rong Chen het volgende geschreven: > Hi Stef, > > I am interested to know how did you proceed on this. Did you use > the "Generic name" node of the archetype "openEHR-EHR- > ITEM_TREE.medication.v1" for the drug substances or ATC code? > > Cheers, > Rong > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2006 at 10:40 PM, Sam Heard > <sam.heard at oceaninformatics.biz> wrote: > I agree with Peter - this should generally be resolved in a > knowledge base, Sam > > > Elkin, Peter L. M.D. wrote: >> >> Stef, >> >> The correct Ontological method for solving this problem is to have an >> organizing concept for the drug independent of its formulation. >> In the >> NDF-RT that would be the Preparations (e.g. Atenolol Preparation) >> which >> can have different strengths and formulations (groups of inactive >> ingredients as children of the more general concept). >> >> Warm regards, >> >> Peter >> >> Peter L. Elkin, MD >> Professor of Medicine >> Mayo Clinic College of Medicine >> (507) 284-1551 >> Fax: (507) 284-5370 >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: openehr-clinical-bounces at openehr.org >> [mailto:openehr-clinical-bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of Stef >> Verlinden >> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 5:10 PM >> To: openehr-clinical at openehr.org >> Subject: Multiple terminologies >> >> Dear all, >> >> I need some help/explanation/advice on how to attach multiple >> terminologies to the same entry. If I understand the concept >> correctly it seems that there are two manners to do so. Let me >> explain first what I would like to do: >> >> In the Dutch archetype for 'medication' I'm trying to make, I would >> like to attach several terminologies to the same medicine. In the >> Netherlands we use the G-standard which comprises of many sub >> terminologies. For instance there is a different code for generic and >> for 'named' drugs, which seem to be specific for the Netherlands. >> Furthermore each drug combination (drug, dose, delivery form and >> producer) has an unique code. To make it even more complex, this code >> was first specific for the Netherlands (RVG code) alone and then >> harmonized for the EU (EU code). Older drugs only have a RVG code. >> Then this medicine can also be related to the ATC code...... To make >> a long story short, I would like to be able to attach all these >> terminologies to the same medicine. >> >> First I figured that I put al those items in one 'medicine' (sub) >> three. So Medicine name/dose/delivery form, GPK, HPK, EU, RVG, ATC. >> The latter would then have constraints for that specific (sub) >> terminology. >> But now I just found out that it possible to create multiple ... (I >> don't know how to call this. I've found it for example in the >> archetype evaluation-injury, under the entry 'factor'. It has a >> symbol which resembles a switch). To me it seems that I can use this >> to attach several terminologies to the same item as well. In the >> 'interface' option' all these 'terminologies' are then displayed as >> tabs. >> >> My question is: how can I best solve this issue. Can I use both >> methods or is one of them to prefer over the other and why? >> >> Furthermore can somebody explain to me how I can create the switch >> type function. I known it exists since it's present in some >> archetypes but haven't found out how to create one via the Ocean >> archetype editor (latest version). >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> Stef Verlinden >> _______________________________________________ >> openEHR-clinical mailing list >> openEHR-clinical at openehr.org >> http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openEHR-clinical mailing list >> openEHR-clinical at openehr.org >> http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical >> >> > > -- > Dr. Sam Heard > MBBS, FRACGP, MRCGP, DRCOG, FACHI > > CEO and Clinical Director > Ocean Informatics Pty. Ltd. > Adjunct Professor, Health Informatics, Central Queensland University > Senior Visiting Research Fellow, CHIME, University College London > Chair, Standards Australia, EHR Working Group (IT14-9-2) > Ph: +61 (0)4 1783 8808 > Fx: +61 (0)8 8948 0215 > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-clinical mailing list > openEHR-clinical at openehr.org > http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-clinical mailing list > openEHR-clinical at openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20080604/9ec55687/attachment.html>
