Hi, Heather I'm much interested in this project, because we are just launching a few projects. as Eric mentioned, I think incubator would be good.
Shinji 2014/07/11 14:46 "Heather Leslie" <heather.leslie at oceaninformatics.com>: > Hi everyone, > > > > *I cautiously send this email as I?m aware that it can be perceived to > border on the line between commercial and community, so request if anyone > is interested in following through with my idea to email me privately and > not use the list any further.* > > > > I?ve been approached by someone requesting an academic CKM instance that > could be used for university teaching purposes. > > > > So I am curious to see if there was broader interest in establishing a > shared academic CKM for use by universities - for academic, non-commercial > purposes only. > > > > I?m proposing a solution that would operate a little along the lines of > the UK CKM, where there are a number of academic entities sharing the same > CKM domain instance, but each with their own autonomous subdomains. This > could be useful to kickstart some collaborative academic activity between > universities in clinical knowledge management. > > > > There are pros and cons for this arrangement, which I?ve tried to outline > below: > > > > Pros: > > ? All functionality of the standard CKM will be fully available > (ie what you currently see on the openEHR CKM) ? the library, collaborative > portal and governance/distribution capability will be fully enabled, > including projects/incubators and running archetype/template reviews. > > ? You would have autonomy within your subdomain (ie effectively a > folder or subset of the whole CKM instance) and all of the assets within it. > > ? The price per university would be minimised as the costs in > running, maintaining and hosting the CKM instance would be shared by all. > > ? As more universities came on board, potentially the cost of the > subdomain based on the shared running costs would be minimised, and the > license price would mostly be based on the number of assets in the > subdomain ie starting with a minimum of 50, and above that it is based on > honest usage. > > Cons: > > ? If we had multiple universities participating in a single CKM > instance who are not coordinating their activity, then I would anticipate > that the CKM could become quite a mixed and confused set of models ? > acceptable perhaps for academic purposes, but not a good basis for > implementations, except at subdomain level. > > ? No choice about others who would share your CKM instance. > > ? No control over what activity occurred in other subdomains eg > others may upload other archetypes that were similar or potentially > conflicting. This is being managed to some degree in the UK instance by the > presence of Ian McNicoll, but may not be possible if a widely varied group > of academic institutions participate. Coordination between the other > subdomain users would be up to all parties voluntarily deciding to work > together. > > > > I would propose an initial CKM to be in English, although if there was > enough interest from a single language group, we could potentially arrange > for a number of translated CKMs as well. > > > > Please contact me on heather.leslie at oceaninformatics.com if you have any > questions or wish to express interest. > > > > I am also planning to attend MIE 2014 in Istanbul next month if anyone > wants to discuss this further. > > > > Regards > > > > Heather > > > > *Dr Heather Leslie* > MBBS FRACGP FACHI > Director/Consulting Lead > *Ocean Informatics <http://www.oceaninformatics.com/>* > Phone - +61 418 966 670 > Skype - heatherleslie > Twitter - @omowizard > > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-clinical mailing list > openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org > > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20140711/acc8fa95/attachment.html>
