This a great initiative, at the moment we offer courses online in several 
universities in Latino America.
So, Im interested.
 
Cheers Crol

 
From: pazospa...@hotmail.com
To: openehr-clinical at lists.openehr.org
Subject: RE: Potential interest in establishment of an academic CKM instance?
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 01:02:54 -0300




This would be really nice. One thing my students find difficult to do is the 
upload process to the CKM because archetypes should be committed manually to 
editors, then the initial review process takes some time. For students it would 
be nice to let them upload their archetypes directly in an academic CKM without 
any constraints or process, see the mind map diagram, check the validation 
rules, etc. This will also simplify archetype review by me :) instead of 
reading all the ADL and see the archetypes in the AE, I can use the great mind 
map view.

Also, having something in spanish would help a lot.
* This is not for any university, we're giving the openEHR course from an 
organization of professionals (the Chilean association of medical informatics).

-- 
Kind regards,
Eng. Pablo Pazos Guti?rrez
http://cabolabs.com

From: heather.les...@oceaninformatics.com
To: openehr-clinical at lists.openehr.org
Subject: Potential interest in establishment of an academic CKM instance?
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 05:46:00 +0000









Hi everyone,
 
I cautiously send this email as I?m aware that it can be perceived to border on 
the line between commercial and community, so request if anyone is interested 
in following through with my idea to email me privately and not use the list
 any further.
 
I?ve been approached by someone requesting an academic CKM instance that could 
be used for university teaching purposes.
 
So I am curious to see if there was broader interest in establishing a shared 
academic CKM for use by universities - for academic, non-commercial purposes 
only.
 
I?m proposing a solution that would operate a little along the lines of the UK 
CKM, where there are a number of academic entities sharing the same CKM domain 
instance, but each with their own autonomous subdomains. This could be useful
 to kickstart some collaborative academic activity between universities in 
clinical knowledge management.
 
There are pros and cons for this arrangement, which I?ve tried to outline below:
 
Pros:
?        
All functionality of the standard CKM will be fully available (ie what you 
currently see on the openEHR CKM) ? the library, collaborative portal and 
governance/distribution capability will be fully enabled, including 
projects/incubators
 and running archetype/template reviews.
?        
You would have autonomy within your subdomain (ie effectively a folder or 
subset of the whole CKM instance) and all of the assets within it.
?        
The price per university would be minimised as the costs in running, 
maintaining and hosting the CKM instance would be shared by all.
?        
As more universities came on board, potentially the cost of the subdomain based 
on the shared running costs would be minimised, and the license price would 
mostly be based on the number of assets in the subdomain ie starting with
 a minimum of 50, and above that it is based on honest usage. 
Cons:
?        
If we had multiple universities participating in a single CKM instance who are 
not coordinating their activity, then I would anticipate that the CKM could 
become quite a mixed and confused set of models ? acceptable perhaps for
 academic purposes, but not a good basis for implementations, except at 
subdomain level.

?        
No choice about others who would share your CKM instance.

?        
No control over what activity occurred in other subdomains eg others may upload 
other archetypes that were similar or potentially conflicting. This is being 
managed to some degree in the UK instance by the presence of Ian McNicoll,
 but may not be possible if a widely varied group of academic institutions 
participate. Coordination between the other subdomain users would be up to all 
parties voluntarily deciding to work together.

 
I would propose an initial CKM to be in English, although if there was enough 
interest from a single language group, we could potentially arrange for a 
number of translated CKMs as well.
 
Please contact me on 
heather.leslie at oceaninformatics.com if you have any questions or wish to 
express interest.
 
I am also planning to attend MIE 2014 in Istanbul next month if anyone wants to 
discuss this further.
 
Regards
 
Heather
 
Dr Heather Leslie

MBBS FRACGP FACHI

Director/Consulting  Lead

Ocean Informatics

Phone -  +61 418 966 670

Skype - heatherleslie

Twitter - @omowizard
 




_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org    
                                  

_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org    
                                  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20140713/541192d1/attachment.html>

Reply via email to