Dear Thomas,
We have made a document for internal use. Will polish it over the weekend
and share it with you.

Regards

On Wed 19 Jun, 2019, 7:03 PM Thomas Beale, <thomas.be...@openehr.org> wrote:

>
> Hi Dileep,
>
> it would be interesting if you could publish anything about your virtual
> folder design, because more is being added to the RM to standardise how
> FOLDERs are used to represent episodes, mainly based on how DIPS (Norway)
> and Code24 (NL) do it. See SPECRM-55 and SPECRM-56
> <https://openehr.atlassian.net/projects/SPECRM/versions/12516/tab/release-report-all-issues>.
> THis is certainly not complete, and indeed we have not yet published a
> guide for how to use Folders to do this (there probably is not yet full
> agreement anyway). Nevertheless, both these vendors have sophisticated
> approaches to using FOLDERs for episodes, and it would be good to have any
> other ideas to add to the mix so that we could either standardise a single
> approach, or else describe a small number of extant approaches such that
> client software can figure out what kind of episode representation it is
> dealing with.
>
> ANother thing, just for reference: from a formal point of view, what gets
> committed due to an encounter is always be a Contribution, i.e. an openEHR
> change set (thinking in DVCS, e.g. Git terms). A Contribution can contain
> any / all of:
>
>    - completely new TLO(s)
>    - new version(s) of any existing TLO(s)
>    - change(s) to any existing TLO(s)
>    - logical deletion(s) of any TLO(s)
>    - changes to path structure of any TLO with such a structure (=
>    directory)
>
> Here, TLO = 'top-level object', which can be the following from the EHR
> model
> <https://specifications.openehr.org/releases/RM/latest/ehr.html#_change_control_in_the_ehr>
> :
>
>    - COMPOSITION
>    - directory, consisting of FOLDERs
>    - EHR_STATUS
>    - EHR_ACCESS
>
> And from the Demographic model
> <https://specifications.openehr.org/releases/RM/latest/demographic.html>:
>
>    - PARTY
>    - PARTY_RELATIONSHIP
>
> ANd from the Task Planning model
> <https://specifications.openehr.org/releases/PROC/latest/task_planning.html>
> :
>
>    - COMPOSITION containing WORK_PLAN or TASK_PLAN
>
> It is of course very common that the result of an encounter is just one
> new COMPOSITION, or one new version of one existing COMPOSITION - but just
> as with Git or any other versioning system, this requires a Contribution
> since it is still a change set.
>
> Full versioning semantics here
> <https://specifications.openehr.org/releases/RM/latest/common.html#_change_control_package>,
> for reference.
>
> - thomas
>
>
> On 05/06/2019 12:15, Dileep V S wrote:
>
> Dear Gerard,
>
> Thanks for your response. Your point of a composition being designed to
> record a complete encounter is worth another discussion.
>
> I personally feel that it is one way of implementing your CDR, but there
> could be other equally effective approaches that work better in other
> situations. For example in the CDR service component of our platform
> (EHR.Network), we have gone with generic reusable templates such as
> complaints, diagnosis, medication summary, medication order etc. The
> application can compose the complete schema for different encounter/event
> use cases using a combination of these generic templates. The data gathered
> in any event is grouped together under episodes and events using the
> virtual folder service.
>
> This approach ensures the generic nature of the platform, while
> maintaining it's extensibility over time. It also helps us contain the
> proliferation of templates and keeps our library of commonly used stored
> queries to a manageable level.
>
> May be there are other better approaches than either of these that are
> already being used by others. I feel the approach to choose will depend
> upon the requirements and so maintaining flexibility for the implementer
> will be crucial.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> openEHR-clinical@lists.openehr.org
>
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
>
_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org

Reply via email to