On 13/09/2012 10:15, David Moner wrote: > Hi, > > 2012/9/13 Erik Sundvall <erik.sundvall at liu.se > <mailto:erik.sundvall at liu.se>> > > It would be great if e.g most of the future ISO 13606 version > could be a true subset of openEHR instead of the current confusing > situation. > > > This is something I discussed with Thomas some time ago, it would be > one of the best harmonisation solutions, but probably with a slightly > different interpretation. Since 13606 has more generic classes (eg. > the generic ENTRY can represent all of OBSERVATION, EVALUATION, > INSTRUCTION, ACTION), instead of 13606 being a subset of openEHR I > think that openEHR should be a specialized model of 13606. Obviously > this would require a deep analysis and changes of the models, but that > could be the idea.
I don't care about the linguistics of subset / specialisation etc, I just care about getting one model.... - thomas * * -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20121003/98d1dd21/attachment.html>
