Well, we have explored the use of Schematron and how it can be automatically generated from archetypes (the idea was to rewrite CDA implementation guides as CDA archetypes and generate schematron automatically from them). I won't go into much detail, but we were able to generate assert and report instructions easily. The only thing unexplored was the use of phases. I would say we are in the 80 of the 80/20 rule :)
2013/4/23 Thomas Beale <thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com>: > On 23/04/2013 10:37, Bert Verhees wrote: >> >> >> > have ADL, AOM, and object transforms >> >> What is missing is that xml offers validation and query out of the box, >> which means it has been developed and optimized for years by many companies >> and communities, and mostly is good quality software. >> > > ok but we just agreed that XSD doesn't do the kind of validation that is > needed by archetypes, so I think what you are really proposing is XML based > on Relax NG as a sufficiently powerful approach that would a) implement the > required constraint semantics of archetypes and b) create data that can be > queried by Xpath/Xquery out of the box? > > Is that your suggestion? > > If so, my reaction would be: let's investigate as a community. I don't think > anyone has sufficiently investigated Relax NG or Schematron for openEHR > purposes, and in hindsight we probably should have. It would be very > interesting indeed to see how much better it would work than XSD. > > I think if you make any progress in your work on these questions, let's turn > them into specs / guidelines / whatever for general use in openEHR. > > > - thomas > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
