On 26-08-15 14:44, Ian McNicoll wrote:
That is fair enough but we were asked to characterise the differences
between 13606 and openEHR and I am comfortable that the actual and formal
adoption of AQL is one of those differences.
If you see it from the formal point of specifications, you are right,
but as you say, ISO13606 is in a renewal process, and it is hard to
foresee what will come out of that.
You write yourself that support for ADL/AOM 2.0 is being considered, I
am very happy to read that.
Then it is a small step to AQL based on AOM 2.0 adoption.
I couldn't think of a strong reason why they should not adopt AQL when
they adopt AOM2.0.
Untill now, there has only been AOM 1.4, also for OpenEHR, and the AQL
for AOM 1.4 has always been a moving target.
That is why I never implemented it, but also because I did not really
need it.
So we could say, that there is no formal specification for AQL based on
AOM 1.4 and that OpenEHR, technically said, like ISO13606, does not
support AQL.
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
