We are in agreement, then.      :-)

Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl <mailto:gf...@luna.nl>
> On 26 aug. 2015, at 17:06, Ian McNicoll <i...@freshehr.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Gerard,
> 
> Agreed - I was using messaging loosely - 'interfacing between systems' is 
> better.
> 
> Ian
> 
> Dr Ian McNicoll
> mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
> office +44 (0)1536 414994
> skype: ianmcnicoll
> email: i...@freshehr.com <mailto:i...@freshehr.com>
> twitter: @ianmcnicoll
> 
> 
> Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation ian.mcnic...@openehr.org 
> <mailto:ian.mcnic...@openehr.org>
> Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd.
> Director, HANDIHealth CIC
> Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL
> 
> On 26 August 2015 at 15:04, "Gerard Freriks (privé)" <gf...@luna.nl 
> <mailto:gf...@luna.nl>> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I must repeat the scope of 13606 verbatim once more.
> It is NOT only for messaging but also for Interfaces
> 
> 
> 
> Gerard Freriks
> +31 620347088 <tel:%2B31%20620347088>
> gf...@luna.nl <mailto:gf...@luna.nl>
> 
> 
> 
> Scope
> This standard is for the communication of part or all of the electronic 
> health record (EHR) of a single identified subject of care between EHR 
> systems, or between EHR systems and a centralised EHR data repository. 
> 
> It may also be used for EHR communication between an EHR system or repository 
> and clinical applications or middleware components (such as decision support 
> components) that need to access or provide EHR data. 
> 
> This standard will predominantly be used to support the direct care given to 
> identifiable individuals, or to support population monitoring systems such as 
> disease registries and public health surveillance. Uses of health records for 
> other purposes such as teaching, clinical audit, administration and 
> reporting, service management, research and epidemiology, which often require 
> anonymisation or aggregation of individual records, are not the focus of this 
> standard but such secondary uses might also find the standard useful. 
> 
> This Part 1 of the multipart standard is an Information Viewpoint 
> specification as defined by the Open Distributed Processing – Reference model 
> (ISO/IEC 10746). This standard is not intended to specify the internal 
> architecture or database design of EHR systems. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On 26 aug. 2015, at 14:57, Sebastian Garde 
>> <sebastian.ga...@oceaninformatics.com 
>> <mailto:sebastian.ga...@oceaninformatics.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> I'd agree with Ian here. 
>> While both could possibly support AQL, the difference I see is in intent, 
>> scope and actual implementation.
>> As Gerard says, 13606's main aim is to communicate between IT-systems and 
>> for this, AQL may not be quite as fundamental as it is to openEHR.
>> 
>> Sebastian
>> 
>> 
>> On 26.08.2015 14:44, Ian McNicoll wrote:
>>> Hi Bert,
>>> 
>>> "I would leave it with: AQL is an archetype bound query language, and every 
>>> system which is build on archetypes is able to implement AQL."
>>> 
>>> That is fair enough but we were asked to characterise the differences 
>>> between 13606 and openEHR and I am comfortable that the actual and formal 
>>> adoption of AQL is one of those  differences.
>>> 
>>> AQL is on the openEHR specifications roadmap but AFAIK this is not the case 
>>> for 13606. Of course that does not stop 13606 vendors implementing AQL but 
>>> in terms of actual differences between the 2 communities the adoption, or 
>>> intention to adopt AQL seems (from the outside) somewhat different both at 
>>> a practical and formal level.
>>> 
>>> Although AQL adoption in the openEHR community is far from universal, most 
>>> of the vendors/developers that I have spoken to see it as something they 
>>> want to implement, particularly as GDL is somewhat dependent on AQL.
>>> 
>>> I am just trying to ascertain if there is similar enthusiasm/intention 
>>> amongst 13606 vendors, or if AQL forms part of the current 13606 refresh 
>>> discussions.
>>> 
>>> Ian
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Dr Ian McNicoll
>>> mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 <tel:%2B44%20%280%29775%20209%207859>
>>> office +44 (0)1536 414994 <tel:%2B44%20%280%291536%20414994>
>>> skype: ianmcnicoll
>>> email: i...@freshehr.com <mailto:i...@freshehr.com>
>>> twitter: @ianmcnicoll
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation  
>>> <mailto:ian.mcnic...@openehr.org>ian.mcnic...@openehr.org 
>>> <mailto:ian.mcnic...@openehr.org>
>>> Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd.
>>> Director, HANDIHealth CIC
>>> Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL
>>> 
>>> On 26 August 2015 at 13:28, Bert Verhees <bert.verh...@rosa.nl 
>>> <mailto:bert.verh...@rosa.nl>> wrote:
>>> On 26-08-15 14:23, Ian McNicoll wrote:
>>> but am not aware of any non-openEHR
>>> implementations
>>> Is there a Xhosa implementation of 13606 or OpenEHR?
>>> 
>>> Does that mean OpenEHR or 13606 are not able to support Xhosa?
>>> 
>>> I would leave it with: AQL is an archetype bound query language, and every 
>>> system which is build on archetypes is able to implement AQL.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> openEHR-technical mailing list
>>> openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org 
>>> <mailto:openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org>
>>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
>>>  
>>> <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> openEHR-technical mailing list
>>> openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org 
>>> <mailto:openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org>
>>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
>>>  
>>> <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org>
>> -- 
>>  
>> Dr. Sebastian Garde
>> Dr. sc. hum., Dipl.-Inform. Med, FACHI
>> Ocean Informatics
>> 
>> Skype: gardeseb
>> 
>> 
>>   <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>  
>> Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft. 
>> www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
>> _______________________________________________
>> openEHR-technical mailing list
>> openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org 
>> <mailto:openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org>
>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
>>  
>> <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org 
> <mailto:openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org>
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org 
> <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org

_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org

Reply via email to