On 04-09-15 19:55, Ian McNicoll wrote:
I am happy to debate the relevant merits of the ISO vs. open-source approaches recognising
The one does not exclude the other, I would say.

But on second thought, does ISO prohibit giving a free license, or publishing the specs for free?
I am not sure about that.
I am sure they prohibit publishing their document.

As is with AOM1.4, it is published as ISO's version by ISO (as part of ISO13606) and it is published as OpenEHR's version by OpenEHR , so that can be done.
That both contain the same information.

It is a bit Kafkaesk, but that is normal when bureaucrats get involved.


Bert

_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org

Reply via email to