Using the rules could be a useful approach. One thing we decided in the
SEC meeting last week was to rework the 'rules' part of ADL as a small
core model in the BASE component and then re-use that back into ADL2 and
also GDL. This will result in a new small BASE/Rules specification and
the ADL2 and GDL models of rules will then be rewritten to be based on
this. I'm working on the BASE/Rules component right now, and will put it
up very soon in draft (status = DEVELOPMENT) form, so anyone can have a
go at working on it.
I've managed to clean up some of the semantics around functions and
variables etc, so I think the initial version will be reasonable. There
are others who know this area better than I do, so I encourage them to
have a look and if interested to contribute to improving the models, get
involved.
BTW the ADL workbench does display rules:
- thomas
On 17/02/2016 09:08, Diego Boscá wrote:
Both ADL1.4 and ADL2 support assertions (rules in ADL2)
http://www.openehr.org/releases/AM/latest/docs/ADL1.4/ADL1.4.html#_assertions
http://www.openehr.org/releases/AM/latest/docs/ADL2/ADL2.html#_rules_2
The bad news about that is that I believe that no ADL editor supports
them yet (as far as I know). We are now researching in this area and
will have some results in the near future.
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
