Thanks Tom - this could finally make me an ADL Workbench user ;) Cheers,
-koray From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Beale Sent: Thursday, 18 February 2016 12:01 a.m. To: openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org Subject: Re: Strange use of 'offset' as a settable RM attribute Using the rules could be a useful approach. One thing we decided in the SEC meeting last week was to rework the 'rules' part of ADL as a small core model in the BASE component and then re-use that back into ADL2 and also GDL. This will result in a new small BASE/Rules specification and the ADL2 and GDL models of rules will then be rewritten to be based on this. I'm working on the BASE/Rules component right now, and will put it up very soon in draft (status = DEVELOPMENT) form, so anyone can have a go at working on it. I've managed to clean up some of the semantics around functions and variables etc, so I think the initial version will be reasonable. There are others who know this area better than I do, so I encourage them to have a look and if interested to contribute to improving the models, get involved. BTW the ADL workbench does display rules: [cid:image001.png@01D16A35.AD988580] - thomas On 17/02/2016 09:08, Diego Boscá wrote: Both ADL1.4 and ADL2 support assertions (rules in ADL2) http://www.openehr.org/releases/AM/latest/docs/ADL1.4/ADL1.4.html#_assertions http://www.openehr.org/releases/AM/latest/docs/ADL2/ADL2.html#_rules_2 The bad news about that is that I believe that no ADL editor supports them yet (as far as I know). We are now researching in this area and will have some results in the near future.
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org