I also like this diagram a lot, big improvement on the old one! 😊 Would it be relevant to add a cylinder for terminologies in the knowledge development environment part (with arrows to archetypes and templates), to show explicitly that they’re thought of and highly relevant?
Regards, Silje From: openEHR-technical <openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org> On Behalf Of Gunnar Klein Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 2:22 PM To: For openEHR technical discussions <openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org> Subject: Re: Two-level modelling diagram I liked much of the figure but why do you have to cylinders for value sets. Should be better with one like for templates. kind regards gunnar Den ons 28 nov. 2018 13:23 skrev Thomas Beale <thomas.be...@openehr.org<mailto:thomas.be...@openehr.org>>: This diagram <https://www.openehr.org/releases/BASE/latest/docs/architecture_overview/diagrams/two_level_engineering.svg> (SVG) is a replacement for an old one used in a lot of papers. People who want a better diagram might like this one, from a more recent version of the Architecture Overview. [cid:part2.295C89A2.4740AC48@openehr.org] _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org<mailto:openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
