Am Donnerstag 21 Januar 2010 01:37:35 schrieb Albert Cervera i Areny: > A Dijous, 21 de gener de 2010, Raphaël Valyi va escriure: > > Albert, I think we have to consider * OpenERP (as any other) must comply to legal and audit requirements (top priority) * OpenERP partners contribute (code, fee) and use OpenERP as source of their income.
Hence the bug fix and especially new features must be checked and cross checked. BTW - The merge of my branch was rejected - without any comment - although Fabien agreed with me on the phone that it will be integrated. So I find myself in a position having to maintain a branch which I never have intended to. This should be avoided by setting up a steering process. New features: these can be realized as modules or must be integrated. * integration if ** it is a common need (Example:Rounding, Price Unit, Layout ...) ** implementing as a module would break dependent modules * New extra modules IMHO we need a platform to discuss and manage (!) this. KDE schedule, release goals , feature plan are usable examples on how to setup the steering process. I completely agree - this is work in the beginning but I think also it's worthwhile. -- Best Regards ChriCar Beteiligungs- und Beratungs- GmbH http://www.chricar.at/ChriCar/index.html Dr. Ferdinand Gassauer Official Tiny Partner
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community-leaders Post to : openerp-community-leaders@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community-leaders More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp