Can you add this to the OpenFlow Plugin user guide? Ideally it should be
under a section probably called configuration parameters (or something
else?).

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Shuva Jyoti Kar <
shuva.jyoti....@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Hi Devs,
>
>
>
> The table-features has been turned off by default in the master(carbon)
> branch. For those who require it , please follow the following steps:
>
>
>
> 1.       Run the karaf from the distribution
>
> 2.       Install the openflowplugin features –
>
> *opendaylight-user@root>feature:install odl-openflowplugin-southbound*
>
> *opendaylight-user@root>feature:install odl-openflowplugin-flow-services*
>
> 3.       Find *org.opendaylight.openflowplugin.cfg in /etc*  and edit it
> to say *skip-table-features=false*
>
> 4.       Connect the switches then , table-features will be enabled
>
> *PS : Please ensure that no switches are connected while editing the
> config file.*
>
>
>
> Do let us know in case you have any doubts.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> shuva
>
>
>
> *From:* openflowplugin-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:
> openflowplugin-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] *On Behalf Of *Abhijit
> Kumbhare
> *Sent:* Friday, August 05, 2016 12:45 AM
> *To:* Yrineu Rodrigues
> *Cc:* openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org; An Ho; Tom Pantelis;
> nic-...@lists.opendaylight.org; didm-...@lists.opendaylight.org; Subhash
> Singh
> *Subject:* Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [nic-dev] [didm-dev] Table features
> off by default - to be enabled by DIDM & NIC
>
>
>
> Thanks Yrineu and Subhash! It is also possible that what Shuva comes up
> with may need a small code change for you to enable it - instead of a
> documentation change. Shuva will get in touch with you however.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Yrineu Rodrigues <yfrfel...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Abhijit, thank you for your attention. The same for us (NIC), we'll add
> it on our wiki page.
>
> With regards,
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Subhash Singh <subhash_singh@
> criterionnetworks.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Abhijit,
>
>
>
> Please let us (DIDM) know for the required config changes, I will add it
> in didm user documentation.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> Subhash Kumar Singh
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hello DIDM & NIC,
>
>
>
> We are finding the performance of the oper-datastore inventory slow if
> table features is turned on by default as mentioned by Shuva below. This
> would affect all the users regardless of whether they use the table
> features or not. DIDM & NIC are the only ones using the table features.
> Hence from our OpenFlow Plugin meeting today we decided we will keep the
> default configuration to be table features off and have DIDM/NIC enable it
> when they need it. We are still deciding whether we start it off as a
> config change (most likely) and/or transition it to be a run-time change
> (less likely in the Boron release). Jozef, Shuva, etc. will follow up later
> with the instructions - but we would need you to either implement the
> change to turn it on (if it is a run time option) - or have instructions in
> your user level documentation to turn it on (config time option).
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Abhijit
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 12:58 AM, Shuva Jyoti Kar <
> shuva.jyoti....@ericsson.com> wrote:
>
> First take – with even one switch connected the restconf hangs when we try
> querying the oper-DS via apidoc.
>
> Over Postman its extremely slow.  And avoid oper-Ds writes for
> applications that might not require this.
>
>
>
> It would be really nice to measure the performance for scaled out
> scenarios – switch scaleout + large config( a mil flows scenario )
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> shua
>
>
>
> *From:* Jozef Bacigál [mailto:jozef.baci...@pantheon.tech]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 03, 2016 12:32 PM
> *To:* Abhijit Kumbhare; Anil Vishnoi; openflowplugin-dev@lists.
> opendaylight.org
> *Cc:* Tom Pantelis; Muthukumaran K; Shuva Jyoti Kar; Luis Gomez;
> didm-...@lists.opendaylight.org; nic-...@lists.opendaylight.org
> *Subject:* RE: Patch for tuning table features
>
>
>
> Hi guys,
>
>
>
> Sorry I wasn’t here for two days, but first thing the patch seems good.
> Second thing I see no problem when the table features stay switched ON.
> Before the changes the table features were inside the tables and with each
> table we always loaded full features. Now are the features on the same
> level as table so performance in boron get better. It would be nice to have
> some performance test with ON/OFF table features with this patch set.
>
>
>
> Jozef
>
>
>
> *From:* Abhijit Kumbhare [mailto:abhijitk...@gmail.com
> <abhijitk...@gmail.com>]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 3, 2016 7:37 AM
> *To:* Anil Vishnoi <vishnoia...@gmail.com>; openflowplugin-dev@lists.
> opendaylight.org
> *Cc:* Tom Pantelis <tompante...@gmail.com>; Muthukumaran K <
> muthukumara...@ericsson.com>; Shuva Jyoti Kar <
> shuva.jyoti....@ericsson.com>; Jozef Bacigál <jozef.baci...@pantheon.tech>;
> Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com>; didm-...@lists.opendaylight.org;
> nic-...@lists.opendaylight.org
> *Subject:* Re: Patch for tuning table features
>
>
>
> Yes - we should reach out to DIDM & the NIC project - but I want to also
> discuss this in this week's meeting.
>
>
>
> I have added the OpenFlow Plugin mailing list - as well as DIDM & NIC - so
> they can be aware of this discussion. If I remember right we had also
> discussed this earlier - don't remember what we had concluded then.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Anil Vishnoi <vishnoia...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Tom Pantelis <tompante...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> So you have some apps that need table-features enabled but other apps that
> need it off? That sounds like a deployment headache - what if an end user
> has installed an app that needs it on and also an app that needs it off?
> What happens to an app if the setting isn't what it needs?
>
> ​It's moreover like, some apps need it, but apps who don't need it, would
> *prefer* to disable it for performance reason. So if it comes to the
> situation where one app need table features, then other app will have to
> live with it.
>
> But yes, it's still an deployment options, and we were thinking an easy
> way for doing that.​
>
>
>
>
>
> Regardless, this seems like a deployment option for the end user or
> integrator, ie let the user decide what to set it to rather than apps
> trying to set it automatically on install and possibly stomping over one
> another. So if a user installs DIDM, document that they must enable
> table-features.
>
> ​This is also reasonable option, but not sure if didm and nic projects are
> okay with it or not. This might add some work on their plate to fix their
> intergration/csit jobs etc.
>
>
>
> Abhijit, do you think it make sense to reach out to DIDM/NIC project?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 12:29 AM, Muthukumaran K <
> muthukumara...@ericsson.com> wrote:
>
> So, assuming that a set of projects require default-value for a config
> param (table-features in this case) to be true, they would have use what
> comes out of box (assuming that XML what we ship via features.xml sets the
> value to true).
>
> Then another set of projects want to flip – they stop the whole karaf
> container, edit this XML and restart. Or they can edit the XML file on fly ?
>
>
>
> Clarity of this sequence may be useful for how test automation runs CSIT –
> a set of Test suites which require the value to be true (in this example,
> DIDM, NIC) and another set of test suites which require this value to be
> false (everything else other than NIC or DIDM)
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Muthu
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Tom Pantelis [mailto:tompante...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 03, 2016 9:46 AM
> *To:* Anil Vishnoi
> *Cc:* Abhijit Kumbhare; Shuva Jyoti Kar; jozef.baci...@pantheon.tech;
> Muthukumaran K
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: Patch for tuning table features
>
>
>
> If using clustered-app-config, the default value can be set via an
> external XML file that could be shipped via a features.xml. See
> https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Using_Blueprint#Using_the_Datastore
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Anil Vishnoi <vishnoia...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I think two project had dependent (DIDM and NIC) on the table
> features. So if plugin will disable it now, both the project will
> break. So if we want to disable table features, we need to provide
> some solution on how these project can enable it.
>
> Given that all the config nobs are present in data store, didm/nic
> project can overwrite the default value to false, but that will
> restart the openflowplugin model, which i think should be fine.
>
> Tom, do you have any other thoughts on how projects can set value of
> config nob exposed by dependent projects?
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Added Jozef. Since it is Jozef's patch and you are now a committer - you
> can
> > review/merge it :)
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 11:57 PM, Shuva Jyoti Kar
> > <shuva.jyoti....@ericsson.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Sure, sounds good. Can you please review the patch and merge it then ?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Shuva
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From: Abhijit Kumbhare [mailto:abhijitk...@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2016 12:25 PM
> >>
> >>
> >> To: Shuva Jyoti Kar
> >> Cc: Muthukumaran K; Anil Vishnoi
> >> Subject: Re: Patch for tuning table features
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> We should ask DIDM to turn it on if and when they need it.
> >>
> >> On Monday, August 1, 2016, Shuva Jyoti Kar <
> shuva.jyoti....@ericsson.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> I do see your point Abhjit. The spec says “If it wishes to understand
> the
> >> size, types, and order in which tables are consulted, the controller
> >>
> >> sends a OFPMP_TABLE_FEATURES multipart request (see A.3.5.5)”. Hence it
> >> would be optional. Am I correct ?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> But if we turn it off by , will any projects have a problem ? I remember
> >> DIDM having a dependency.
> >>
> >> The current status that exists for the He and Li designs are:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Master
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> He-design: turned on by default, can be turned off
> >>
> >> Li-design :mandatory now[my patch will make it configurable]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Stable/Be
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> He-design: turned on by default, can be turned off
> >>
> >> Li-design: turned off by default  as per
> >> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/36506/4
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I do see a point it making it off by default. Do let me know if I am
> >> missing something
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Shuva
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From: Abhijit Kumbhare [mailto:abhijitk...@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2016 5:20 AM
> >> To: Shuva Jyoti Kar
> >> Cc: Muthukumaran K; Anil Vishnoi
> >> Subject: Re: Patch for tuning table features
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The spec does not say that the table features HAS to be used. I think we
> >> should turn it off on both the He and the Li designs to keep consistent
> >> assuming it is causing enough performance problems.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Shuva Jyoti Kar
> >> <shuva.jyoti....@ericsson.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Absolutely Muthu ,nothing else. Aligining with the spec its been turned
> on
> >> but can be turned off in a manner that aligns with the implementation
> on the
> >> He plugin as well.
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 2:53 AM, Muthukumaran K
> >> <muthukumara...@ericsson.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> It was kept on just to be in alignment with spec and also with He
> plugin’s
> >> config
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Anything else Shuva ?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Muthu
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From: Abhijit Kumbhare [mailto:abhijitk...@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2016 2:52 AM
> >> To: Shuva Jyoti Kar
> >> Cc: Anil Vishnoi; Muthukumaran K
> >> Subject: Re: Patch for tuning table features
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Then shouldn't it be off by default if OVS 2.4 is sending a lot of data
> >> and performance suffers?
> >>
> >> On Saturday, July 30, 2016, Shuva Jyoti Kar <
> shuva.jyoti....@ericsson.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Anil, Abhijit,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I have pushed a patch for turning table-features ON/OFF with the
> >> li-plugin. By default it is on, but can be switched off.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/42821/1
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> We need this fix since by default ovs2.4 sends quite a huge amount of
> data
> >> for each switch connected.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Could you please review the change and let me know your comments.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Shuva
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks
> Anil
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks
>
> Anil
>
>
>
> Jozef*Bacigál*
>
> Software Engineer
>
>
> Sídlo / Mlynské Nivy 56 / 821 05 Bratislava / Slovakia
> R&D centrum / Janka Kráľa 9 /  974 01 Banská Bystrica / Slovakia
> +421 908 766 972 / jozef.baci...@pantheon.tech
> reception: +421 2 206 65 114 / www.pantheon.sk
>
> [image: logo]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> didm-dev mailing list
> didm-...@lists.opendaylight.org
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/didm-dev
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nic-dev mailing list
> nic-...@lists.opendaylight.org
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/nic-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Yrineu Rodrigues*
>
> *OpendayLight NIC PTL/committer*
>
> --
>
> *Linkedin <http://www.linkedin.com/in/yrineu>*
>
> *NIC wiki page*
> <https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Network_Intent_Composition:Main>
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
openflowplugin-dev mailing list
openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev

Reply via email to