Sorry,

I didn't include this in my first email but it took some digging to find 
this link again.

http://www.ahd.com/

Something like the link above I think would be more useful.

On 09/04/2009 07:13 AM, Stephen Beller wrote:
>  
>
> Agreed. What we could really use is a comprehensive "biopsychosocial" 
> (i.e.,
> biomedical, psychological and social) data set of signs, symptoms,
> treatments, history, etc. to help guide the development of health
> information tools that would be of meaningful use to clinicians, 
> researchers
> and consumers. See, for example, an outline of such an extensive data set
> that we compiled 10 years ago at 
> http://nhds.com/clinical_dataset.html. 
> <http://nhds.com/clinical_dataset.html.>
>
> Steve Beller
>
> From: openhealth@yahoogroups.com <mailto:openhealth%40yahoogroups.com> 
> [mailto:openhealth@yahoogroups.com 
> <mailto:openhealth%40yahoogroups.com>] On
> Behalf Of Mark Spohr
> Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 4:03 AM
> To: openhealth@yahoogroups.com <mailto:openhealth%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [openhealth] Open Source HIT and data.gov
>
> Data.gov looks like a good start but there really isn't very much
> health data there. I searched the "Health and Nutrition" category and
> it only came up with 61 records. Most of these were Medicare spending
> reports for various time periods.
> I know the government collects a lot more data than this and it should
> be on this site.
>
> .Mark
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:42 PM, fred trotter<fred.trot...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:fred.trotter%40gmail.com>
> <mailto:fred.trotter%40gmail.com> > wrote:
> > Hi,
> > More and more, I get interview requests asking for me to give the
> > open source perspective to healthcare issues. Sometimes, the 
> questions are
> > excellent, showing pretty deep insights into the problems (other 
> times the
> > reporter has no clue what our movement is about)
> >
> > When a reporter asks me good questions, I like to reward them by
> > giving them not only me own insights and opinions but also a sampling of
> > what the community at large thinks. The better the question, the less
> likely
> > I am to be certain of the answer.
> >
> > Recently, a reporter wanted my take on the information available
> > from data.gov from the perspective of the FOSS health IT community. She
> > asked the following specific questions that I wanted to pass on to the
> > community at large. Feel free to reply to me privately if you have
> opinions
> > you would prefer not to be recorded publicly.
> >
> >
> >
> > 1. What is your view of the healthcare related data sets available 
> on the
> > www.data.gov Web site? How useful are they? Who are the likely 
> users? Are
> > there enough? Which ones do you find most promising?
> >
> >
> >
> > 2. What additional healthcare related data sets would you like to see
> > available on www.data.gov?
> >
> >
> >
> > 3. How significant do you think www.data.gov is as an open source of
> health
> > information? How would you like to see it evolve?
> >
> >
> >
> > 4. Do you foresee any barriers to more healthcare data being shared via
> > www.data.gov?
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Fred Trotter
> > http://www.fredtrotter.com <http://www.fredtrotter.com>
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> -- 
> Mark Spohr, MD
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to