That was a response to the fact that Oracle prefers to self-host.

Tom


On 2013-06-21 09:10, Daniel Zwolenski wrote:
While I agree with Tom that setting up a Nexus (or Artifactory) repo is easy, I 
don't see any point for OSS stuff. That's what Sonatype is for, take advantage 
of it.

Setting up your own Nexus (or Artifactory) is needed if you have proprietary 
stuff that you want to keep private or have licensing restrictions on, but the 
whole point of OpenJDK is to not be that - OSS Sonatype exists to make life 
easier for exactly these sorts of projects.

You may want to setup an internal Nexus inside for your Oracle stuff but then 
you definitely wouldn't be giving us access to that.



On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Tom Eugelink <t...@tbee.org 
<mailto:t...@tbee.org>> wrote:


    What I wanted to say with that (friends always accuse me of not being to 
the point) is that by running a Nexus repo yourself,
    - Oracle is self hosting
    - But also immediately compatible with Maven, Gradle, Ivy, etc
    - Allow other repo's to easily proxy, which improves availability

    I'm more than happy to setup a Nexus.

    Tom


    On 2013-06-21 08:56, Tom Eugelink wrote:


        Installing Nexus is extremely simple (kudo's to sonatype for that). 
I've got a copy running myself, proxying all kinds of other repo's, just to be 
not dependent on other hosting.

        Tom


        On 2013-06-21 08:51, Richard Bair wrote:

            Oracle has this thing about wanting to self host everything. 
However that doesn't stop the community from putting OpenJDK / OpenJFX stuff 
somewhere reasonable until Oracle finally gets all the infrastructure in place 
and the OpenJDK project can then take advantage of it.

            Richard

            On Jun 20, 2013, at 11:34 PM, Daniel Zwolenski <zon...@gmail.com 
<mailto:zon...@gmail.com>> wrote:

                Why not use Sonatype for your repo?

                For third party jars that aren't in central, you can upload 
these assuming the licence allows it:
                
https://docs.sonatype.org/display/Repository/Uploading+3rd-party+Artifacts+to+The+Central+Repository

                For your own stuff that you aren't going to publish for real 
but still want to be available (e.g. latest releases of JFX), publish it as a 
SNAPSHOT. For real stuff, publish it proper into the Maven repo and make it 
available for use by the community.

                It certainly would make my life massively more enjoyable if a 
build of the JRE was available for download for each of the platforms. And 
things like win-launcher.exe and other secondary assets would also make it much 
easier to work on the packaging tools, etc.



                On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Richard Bair <richard.b...@oracle.com 
<mailto:richard.b...@oracle.com>> wrote:
                Yes, working on the web view building. The main issue is there 
are a handful of libs (libxml, libxslt, etc) that we have to figure out where 
to put. I believe these are unaltered by us, but built with different flags to 
strip out stuff we don't need. I've asked Peter whether we can post the build 
instructions to produce these libs, and then figured once anyone can build 
them, it wouldn't be to hard to find a place to put them.

                Ultimately we're trying to get a public artifactory repository 
setup for OpenJDK which would be the natural place for us to put all our 
dependencies like this, but in the meantime we just need a place to put some 
binaries. I know some of these binaries could be found elsewhere but not all of 
them (win64 builds I think are missing for example).

                On Jun 20, 2013, at 8:56 PM, Danno Ferrin <danno.fer...@shemnon.com 
<mailto:danno.fer...@shemnon.com>> wrote:

                    On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Daniel Zwolenski <zon...@gmail.com 
<mailto:zon...@gmail.com>> wrote:

                        This time sending to the list (gets me every time!):

                        Great news!

                        Danno - where does this put us with the JFX78 backport? 
Can we get a build
                        of this for iOS now or what's needed to close this loop?


                    The good news is that my JFX78 project now compiles via 
gradle without
                    needing a stub jar.  I took out the date picker and the 
builders for media
                    and web view.  So you can download it locally and build a 
jfxrt.jar and
                    likely use the ios libs that build currently.  I haven't 
poked around too
                    much with the native bits.  (see 
https://bitbucket.org/narya/jfx78)

                    I also have been working on some maven distribution for 
this, not ready
                    for consumption yet but an accessory build file creates the 
poms and
                    handles the upload tasks (
                    
https://bitbucket.org/narya/jfx78/src/3fe6c37ebdfbed33d1bdc9ad9d6a2037972de680/narya.gradle?at=default
                    ).

                    The date picker will return when the threetenbp jars are 
updated, and media
                    when those files are released.  WebView I either need to 
submit a patch to
                    get it building in gradle or be patient.  But honestly all 
three of these
                    rank in priority for me below writing a jfpackager bundler 
that wraps
                    robovm.


                    The RoboVM Maven plugin is working. I'd be keen to make it 
work with JFX

                        auto included so basically you can create a normal 
project and run mvn
                        robovm:ipad-simulator (robovm:ios-device is under 
construction) and next
                        thing you have a running JFX app on iOS, no mess, no 
fuss.

                        I have a pitch for a suite of fairly major app 
development next week. So
                        many unknowns with JFX and app development at this 
stage! I'm still pretty
                        disappointed that JFX on iOS/Android is not officially 
supported by Oracle
                        (such a massive wtf? for me) - makes it such a risky 
prospect for us on the
                        front line.


                        On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 3:47 AM, Felipe Heidrich <
                        felipe.heidr...@oracle.com 
<mailto:felipe.heidr...@oracle.com>

                            wrote:
                            Hello,


                            We have just open-sourced javafx-font and 
javafx-font-native!

                            Note that a lot of the code we open-sourced today 
is a new implementation
                            based on native text technologies (CoreText for the 
Mac and DirectWrite

                        for

                            Windows).

                            We still have a lot of work to do:
                            - finishing the new linux implementation is a big 
one
                            - testing
                            - improve on sub pixel position text
                            - etc

                            Help is most welcome,

                            Thank you
                            Felipe









Reply via email to