On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 21:12:05 GMT, Nir Lisker <nlis...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> We might, at some point, but my question is about .classpath files probably. 
>>  I don't see MSLBackend.java as being on the source path, which makes me 
>> think you have a different setup, and I'd like to know the difference.
>> 
>> Speaking of errors, I currently have the errors configured to show 0 
>> warnings.  In this particular case, 
>> 
>> `unlikely argument type for collection methods using 'Object'` and 
>> `Unlikely argument type for method equals()` both set to WARNING, though
>> `Perform strict analysis against the expected type` is not checked.
>> 
>> If I enable the latter, I get 229 warnings all over the place.
>> 
>> My concern is that what you found is a real issue, yet (at least my config) 
>> does not show it.
>
> Oh, I thought you were saying that you didn't see that warning because of the 
> compiler configuration, not the project configuration.
> 
> I manually added the source folders that are relevant to this PR and that are 
> not in the default configuration. I'm not sure if there's merit to change the 
> classpath file in the repo.
> 
> `unlikely argument type for collection methods using 'Object'` without 
> `Perform strict analysis against the expected type` is enough to give this 
> warning.

all right, so we probably want to leave the project config as is, and this 
manual change is a one-off.  Do you mind listing the changes here for future 
reference?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1824#discussion_r2232019877

Reply via email to