yes if there is a possibility to speak in the classroom, the option should
be disable mute by default.

2009/5/19 pankaj anand <pankajanan...@gmail.com>

> hi folks,
>
>  the 3rd option is really gud.. this is something like that dimdim virtual
> classroom is doing. Only the moderator or the teacher can speak when the
> classrooms starts. but the other users can apply to speak. the moderator can
> grant them the permission.
>
> with regards
>
> Pankaj anand.
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Sebastian Wagner 
> <seba.wag...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> hi,
>>
>> I think option 3 is great, but I would prefer that you can set an option
>> *enable by default*. So that each participant that enters has the mic
>> enabled by default. So the default setting of a meeting-room should be, that
>> everybody can speak at the same time and the moderator can turn it off.
>>
>> The other question is if you just mute or enable/disable the audio. Mute
>> means you turn the sound off for everybody. Enable/Disable would mean you
>> stop the audio-stream of that participant. That would then make him mute for
>> all automatically and also save the bandwidth.
>>
>> sebastian
>>
>> 2009/5/19 Evgeny Rovinsky <e.rovin...@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>>> Hello Openmeetings,
>>>
>>> The problem of "mute" raises time after time (Issues 299, 691). We
>>> have similar request from our customers to implement it. So I'd like
>>> to ask a society what way to choose. I've got five proposals about
>>> mute functionality enhancement. There's a possibility to choose either
>>> (or different one, you can propose).
>>>
>>> 1.      Moderator has two options (and buttons) for every participant:
>>> (1)
>>> mute/unmute him/her for moderator personally (as it is implemented
>>> now) and (2) mute/umute him for all other participants.
>>> 2.      The same as bullet 1; the moderator has an additional button
>>> "mute
>>> everyone".
>>> 3.      When creating room, a moderator can make this room to be "limited
>>> to talk simultaneously". 1,2,3 etc. people can talk at the same time,
>>> not more. A role of a "speaker" can be given to any participant by the
>>> moderator. The moderator can change the list of "speakers" at any time
>>> (that makes a difference this type of room to a "meeting"). So
>>> moderator has a checkbox against any participants indicating that he
>>> is speaking now. As participants are joining, the moderator lets them
>>> speak (if a vacancy is remaining) or doesn't.
>>> 4.      The same as the above bullet, but at any time the "speaker" is
>>> defined as the loudest participants. Traditional conferences seem to
>>> be designed this way.
>>> 5.      The same as bullet 3; any participant can apply to start
>>> speaking.
>>>
>>> If any of you has the opinion, please, let me know. Any argument would
>>> be appreciated.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Evgeny.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sebastian Wagner
>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>> http://openmeetings.googlecode.com
>> http://www.laszlo-forum.de
>> seba.wag...@gmail.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>


-- 
Sebastian Wagner
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://openmeetings.googlecode.com
http://www.laszlo-forum.de
seba.wag...@gmail.com

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OpenMeetings User" group.
To post to this group, send email to openmeetings-user@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
openmeetings-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/openmeetings-user?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to