On 12/3/2010 14:04, Benson Margulies wrote:
On the one hand, there are tight limits on what you can put in the source tree.
On the other hand, in many legal cases, there is no such thing as GPL
data. It is quite possible that the objectionable properties of the
GPL will be deemed irrelevant. You would want to open a ticket on
LEGAL on JIRA and specify the copyright information, the license, and
exactly what was going to happen to the data.
+1
Benson, I could probably find this somewhere, but do you
know off-hand what the ASF's position with respect to the
Creative Commons license is?
--Thilo
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Jörn Kottmann<[email protected]> wrote:
On 12/3/10 1:29 PM, Thilo Goetz wrote:
On 12/3/2010 13:14, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
[...]
Having room for additional things like a corpus project could be nice,
because people who are interested in the source code might not
want to check out the corpus (if we ever get it created).
So you can either make it convenient to check out
everything, or to check out individual stuff. When
I check out an open source project I tend to get
everything and then later figure out if there is
stuff in there that I don't need. Maybe most people
are different, no idea.
Do you know if it would be possible to check in GPL training?
We cannot distribute it, but we could distribute models built
from it.
There is a private training data repository, but it takes ages
to check it out, so that might be something we should not
stuff into the trunk which contains the source code.
Jörn
