Freddie Chopin wrote: > > However, I would expect Debian (and other distro) people would be a > > bit unhappy about FTBFS on some platforms (namely ARM), what is the > > plan about it? > > The patches you posted were just a bit too late
I could not disagree more with Freddie. I think OpenOCD uses a completely broken release process, and no, anything is *not* better than nothing. "Freezing" development is nonsense. Failure to build is a serious problem with the code and should be fixed quickly in some way, even if by revert, before a release. I don't think it's a great accomplishment that OpenOCD has knowingly released broken code. But sadly I'm not the least bit surprised. //Peter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap2 _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list OpenOCD-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
