On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Kees Jongenburger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Duane Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Attention Beagle Guys, > > Hello Duane. > > I am sure there must be exceptions to your rules but I guess > that having this 3rd state will make it very easy to implement what we > need right now > > Why are those assumptions important?
We're just trying to define some scheme that is sufficiently flexible, yet doesn't add any more complexity than required at this point. It should be easy to do easy things and possible to do hard things... If the above assumption (no changes to order) does not hold a year for now, we'll update OpenOCD with some new scheme based upon that new situation rather than try to define a fantastic scheme that will support anything and everything future and present (which will a) fail b) be overly complex). -- Øyvind Harboe http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer Free eCos workshop in Oslo October 21! http://www.zylin.com/workshop.html _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
