Øyvind Harboe wrote: > A target event wouldn't work terribly well here, as OpenOCD is founded > on the false assumption that the JTAG chain never changes throughout OpenOCDs > lifespan. > Yes, but - I think - the JRC only allows insertions and deletions in a specific order. Not total and random re-arrangements.
If that is true, then as far as the TDI/TDO chain goes - perhaps we can view the problem like this: Traditionally - a tap is INSERTED and thus put in bypass mode. And the TDI/TDO chain is +1 bit longer. What I think OpenOCD needs is another "state" - ie: "Not Inserted", ie: TDI/TDO is +0 or +HUGE longer. That would - I think - keep the "tap order" the same and simplify some things in OpenOCD. -Duane. _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
