On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:28:30PM +0100, Freddie Chopin wrote: > lou.openocd...@fixit.nospammail.net pisze: > > Freddie (and/or anybody else who is interested in this): Please test the > > attached patch against svn trunk and see if it works properly with an RLink. > > for now I can test only with Primer1, so here it goes. > > 1. openocd compiles fine > 2. openocd starts fine and finds Primer > 3. after gdb attaches, there are some warnings, that were not there in > 0.1.0:
Even though it was created against the trunk, the patch ought to apply against 0.1.0, should you wish to try that. I haven't tried that, however. It only touches two files, both of them are used only by the rlink driver, and I haven't made any changes to that since 0.1.0. > Info : accepting 'gdb' connection from 0 > Warn : target was in unknown state when halt was requested > Warn : acknowledgment received, but no packet pending > Info : device id = 0x20016410 > Info : flash size = 128kbytes > Info : JTAG tap: stm32.cpu tap/device found: 0x3ba00477 (Manufacturer: > 0x23b, Part: 0xba00, Version: 0x3) > Info : JTAG Tap/device matched > Info : JTAG tap: stm32.bs tap/device found: 0x16410041 (Manufacturer: > 0x020, Part: 0x6410, Version: 0x1) > Info : JTAG Tap/device matched > target state: halted > Warn : negative reply, retrying > target halted due to debug-request, current mode: Thread > xPSR: 0x01000000 pc: 0x08000394 > Warn : negative reply, retrying > Warn : acknowledgment received, but no packet pending If anybody would care to explain to me what, exactly, these warnings mean, and what, if anything, I could be doing wrong in the rlink driver to cause them, I welcome such assistance. > 4. debugging some sample code works fine. Good. I assume that means that I haven't broken trst or srst further than either was already broken. _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
