=On May 24, 2009, at 9:04 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 20:51 -0700, David Brownell wrote:On Sunday 24 May 2009, Zach Welch wrote:- add iN equivalents to intN_t types; i32 is used by replacements.hThe traditional sibling of a "u32" (unsigned) is an "s32" (signed). I don't know where "i32" came from, it's an interloper.That would be me, taking a blind stab in the dark. Mea culpa. Fixed: new patch attached for consideration. I have also fixed the duplicated section heading in the documentation. Anything else? Cheers, Zach
Maybe I misunderstood. I thought we were deprecating the use of "u32" in favor of the C99-defined "uint32_t". Why would we define another set of types when there a perfectly fine versions already available as part of the language standard?
-- Rick Altherr kc8...@kc8apf.net"He said he hadn't had a byte in three days. I had a short, so I split it with him."
-- Unsigned
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
