Nicolas Pitre a écrit : > > > As far as my opinion matters, I don't think that uint32_t is that much > clearer than u32. It is widely assumed that u32 refers to an integer > and not a float, hence having the information carried everywhere is up > only for additional typing and screen realestate. And Linux makes for a > big example where plenty of odd naming collisions is simply not an issue > in practice (I know this example might not have such a weight for OS X > fans though). > > > Nicolas > _______________________________________________ > I agree, personally I prefer u32 because it is quicker to write.
Michel -- Tired of Microsoft's rebootive multitasking? then it's time to upgrade to Linux. http://home.comcast.net/~mcatudal _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
