> Øyvind mentioned the idea of wrapping the JTAG API in TCP/IP. Aside from > performance implications I think this would require some significant > development efforts with little immediate benefits. Even worse, it would > encourage other JTAG interface vendors to implement their JTAG interface > layer as a binary only driver that talks to the OpenOCD via TCP/IP layer, > too.
Just to be clear: my motivation for JTAG over TCP/IP has nothing to do with USB. I'm interested in it for the purposes of making targets available for testing remotely. Also one of the neat things of OpenOCD is that it has a clever scheme to avoid killing performance with long roundtrips, so performance of JTAG over TCP/IP should actually be usable if not great. I thought the USB discussion could somehow bring about JTAG over TCP/IP indirectly, which would be nice. -- Øyvind Harboe Embedded software and hardware consulting services http://consulting.zylin.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
