On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Steve Franks <bahamasfra...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Andreas Fritiofson > <andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 0.4.0 is rather old, you may be seeing a bug that has already been fixed. > > Grab the latest version from the repo and give it a try. I don't think > > anyone will bother with a bug report against 0.4.0 at this point. > > Is there a reason ubuntu has a "rather old" version in their primary > repositories? Just not as 'sexy' as libreoffice, so no one bothers to > build it? > Pretty much so. Plus the fact that 0.4.0 really is the latest release and packagers are unwilling to use snapshots. Long time between releases isn't the best thing for a fairly active project like this. But I hear that's going to change (but again, where's 0.5.0-rc3?). > > Post a debug log (add -d to the command line) so we can see what's going > on > > under the hood. > > with -d I guess it's not hung, it's just silently ignoring the command Debug: 427 19156 target.c:968 target_call_event_callbacks(): target > event 2 (gdb-halt) > flash write_image erase unlock Main.elf 0Debug: 428 19256 target.c:968 > target_call_event_callbacks(): target event 2 (gdb-halt) > Debug: 429 19357 target.c:968 target_call_event_callbacks(): target > event 2 (gdb-halt) > > Yes, totally ignored. Where are you issuing the flash write_image command? Not to standard input, right? That won't work. Use the command line (-c init -c "reset init" -c "flash write_image erase unlock Main.elf"), an extra config file, the telnet server on port 4444 for interactive use, or just load from within gdb. /Andreas
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
