On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Andreas Fritiofson <andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Steve Franks <bahamasfra...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Andreas Fritiofson >> <andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > 0.4.0 is rather old, you may be seeing a bug that has already been >> > fixed. >> > Grab the latest version from the repo and give it a try. I don't think >> > anyone will bother with a bug report against 0.4.0 at this point. >> >> Is there a reason ubuntu has a "rather old" version in their primary >> repositories? Just not as 'sexy' as libreoffice, so no one bothers to >> build it? > > > Pretty much so. Plus the fact that 0.4.0 really is the latest release and > packagers are unwilling to use snapshots. Long time between releases isn't > the best thing for a fairly active project like this. But I hear that's > going to change (but again, where's 0.5.0-rc3?). >> >> > Post a debug log (add -d to the command line) so we can see what's going >> > on >> > under the hood. >> >> with -d I guess it's not hung, it's just silently ignoring the command >> >> Debug: 427 19156 target.c:968 target_call_event_callbacks(): target >> event 2 (gdb-halt) >> flash write_image erase unlock Main.elf 0Debug: 428 19256 target.c:968 >> target_call_event_callbacks(): target event 2 (gdb-halt) >> Debug: 429 19357 target.c:968 target_call_event_callbacks(): target >> event 2 (gdb-halt) >> >
> Yes, totally ignored. Where are you issuing the flash write_image command? > Not to standard input, right? That won't work. Use the command line (-c init > -c "reset init" -c "flash write_image erase unlock Main.elf"), an extra > config file, the telnet server on port 4444 for interactive use, or just > load from within gdb. Ah, oops! My bad (stdin). Thanks for the help, Steve _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
