On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 15:44, Michael van Elst wrote: > On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 02:29:41PM -0700, David M. Fetter wrote: > > > Well, in our last example problem, the installed instance of gcc was > > simply a vanilla version with no additional options other than the > > default. However we needed the f77 option so we rebuilt the package on > > our build server, then placed the binary in our repository. When we > > went out to the client servers, the build tools didn't see that the new > > gcc version was compiled with this additional option or at least it > > didn't upgrade anything or show that it needed to be upgraded. So > > seemingly the build tools aren't acknowledging the changes. > > Did you tell the build tool on the client servers to use the f77 option ?
Oh. I didn't realize you had to do that with the binaries. Silly me. Thanks. That will most likely fix my problem. -- David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu "Only those who attempt the absurd can achieve the impossible."
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
