> The advantage is that you this way can create your own independent > distribution for your particular software stack.
That's powerful, indeed, perhaps even more compelling when a considerable subset of packages are not hosted by OpenPKG such as closed-source, proprietary. > No, we also patch many upstream sources. Not just for packaging issues, > but also to fix bugs, too add additional features, etc. But the > packaging issues are 95% of the patch reasons, of course. If housekeeping is part of OpenPKG's routine, here might be one for you: Unless Google changes their mind and reinstates their SOAP API (http://googlecode.blogspot.com/2009/08/well-earned-retirement-for-soap-sear ch.html), Net::Google is a candidate for removal from perl-www. Cheers, -ar ______________________________________________________________________ OpenPKG http://openpkg.org User Communication List openpkg-users@openpkg.org
