Hi,

On Samstag, 14. Februar 2009, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
[...]
> I don't know why GnuPG chose to develop their own driver, I guess it
> has something to do with complexity (especially the wrapper
> pth->pthreads) and the hate of Microsoft originating <whatever>.
> I guess cyberjack needed some more functionality, I hope we can figure
> out their reasons, although it was difficult to work with them on
> their PKCS#11 compliance.
[...]

Difficult to work with us? (asking as the maintainer of the cyberjack driver 
for Linux)??

We never talked about PKCS#11...


Regards
Martin Preuss



-- 
"Things are only impossible until they're not"

Martin Preuss - http://www2.aquamaniac.de/
AqBanking - http://www.aqbanking.de/
LibChipcard - http://www.libchipcard.de/
_______________________________________________
opensc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel

Reply via email to