Stefan Teleman wrote: > > > Darren J Moffat wrote: > >> This is on the assumption that GNU binutils 4.3.x is NOT incompatible >> with the gcc we currently ship. If GNU binutils *is* incompatible >> with the gcc we currently ship then IMO this case needs to wait and be >> part of a future case that upgrade gcc as well, otherwise I don't see >> the point in shipping the newer binutils if we ship the older compiler >> (unless the newer binutils are compatible with the compiler we ship). > > For the record: I am *purposely* introducing binutils _first_.
Then this case is incomplete as I can't see the bigger picture with how this fits with GCC4, hence the questions about the gcc4 directory. Please either roll them into one case or provide an overview. -- Darren J Moffat
