Darren J Moffat <Darren.Moffat at Sun.COM> wrote:
> April Chin wrote:
> > An update from the project team on the pfksh93 issue...
> >
> > Although some ideas on disabling built-ins for pfksh93
> > has been proposed, the team has agreed to remove pfksh93 from the case,
> > so we can investigate the correct solution carefully in a future case,
> > without impeding this case.
> >
> > I will remove mention of pfksh93 and the -P and -o profile
> > options from the proposed ksh93.1 and other manpages in the case materials.
>
> Thanks I'm happy with that outcome. Project team please seek the help
> of the security community rather than trying to work this out on your
> own. You can reach us at security-discuss at opensolaris.org
If you remove pfhsh93, you make ksh93 a second class citizen
and gives a bad start for ksh93. Don't do that, rather solve the problems.
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js at cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
